|
|
|
|
|
by gfodor
1742 days ago
|
|
Your argument is refuted by the fact the technology to solve the problem you claim will never be solved literally already exists, one version of which has a market cap of almost $10B.[1] Claiming that a very obvious engineering problem incentivized to being solved is the same as imagining us being incentivized to regress in the way you mention is also weird. [1] https://www.avax.network/ |
|