|
|
|
|
|
by JacobAldridge
5428 days ago
|
|
The articles linked to in the OP (both of which have been discussed on HN before) provide a lot more detail. To answer your specific question, Srivastava called the provincial lottery agency (iirc - it was Canadian) and asked 1) Would they send him a large number of tickets to use for a promotion / fundraiser, and 2) Would they "buy back" at face value any unused tickets. They said they would gladly do both - meaning he could examine before scratching, return unscratched, and also avoid lining up at the drug store to buy 10,000 tic-tac-toe tickets at once! Edit: Previous discussions Srivastava - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2166555
Cash WinFall - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2828122 |
|
I give Srivastava credit for finding and exploiting the loophole, but they also seem to be easily closable. So the scratchoff is vulnerable. Future ones might be as well. A little common sense and better security could avoid another mishap.