Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stingrae 1745 days ago
this sounds like having to go to the dealership and paying for them to give you updated maps for your built-in GPS, a terrible UX.
1 comments

What if upgrades were done over the air, so you didn’t have to go to a dealership. And the base cost of the vehicle comes down, now that there’s a recurring revenue component?

Would that change your mind?

I think Ford's system circa 2012/2013 did OTA updates, but the problem is that they stopped making updates.

Further, there was no modularity to the hardware running the nav/entertainment/app platform, so the hardware got outclassed very quickly for apps anyway, with no ability to swap in a more powerful system.

Which is ironic, because in the 2012 Fords, it's literally just a PC behind your dash, USB ports, hard drive, and all running Windows. It sucks that people are compelled to upgrade a $50k vehicle for lack of $1000 in PC components.

I can understand why that would be a business model, but I really think the vehicle is like a smart TV - nobody should use the junky built-in "smart" platform, but instead use platforms like CarPlay and Auto to bridge/mirror their modular phone capabilities into the vehicle. Vehicles in time just need something like the OBD standard for connecting external processing/info platforms. CarPlay and Auto are steps in the right direction, but.. more abstraction/standardization/modularity please.

Volkswagen has a system like this in production already with CarNet with subscription pricing for things like better voice control, tracking, and maps.

https://carnet.vw.com/#/plan-pricing