[tristan9]

> This is great in terms of success as a website, but it's underwhelming in terms of describing a technical problem.

A bit of an intro punchline, even though I agree it admittedly doesn't say much on itself :)

Fwiw most of the work is that there's little "static" traffic going on -- images and cacheable responses are not very CPU intensive to serve -- but what isn't static (which is a good chunk of it) is more problematic, but more to come on these