|
|
|
|
|
by btilly
1752 days ago
|
|
No, it is exactly the opposite. The well-documented failings of psychology should cause us to take a closer look at other fields to see if they have similar problems. If they don't, then great. If they do, then fix them. For example people studying metascience have found that a lot of medical research is of questionable accuracy. It is not as bad as psychology. But it is bad and I'm glad that people are taking this problem seriously. |
|
I came at it from another direction here — there are people who are like: "Look at the replication crisis in psychology — this is proof science cannot be trusted in general". So what I meant to argue here is that this conclusion cannot be drawn automatically, not that we shouldn't scrutinize other fields (we should!)