|
|
|
|
|
by open-source-ux
1750 days ago
|
|
There are also misleading photos - not fake images but a more subtle attempt to manipulate viewers. A mundane example: You're browsing a property website, look through the pictures, and then visit a property only to discover the rooms are tiny matchbox-sized spaces. They looked so much more spacious when you viewed them online. You're just discovered wide-lens-photography for real estate - purposely distorts or make a space look spacious. A 'fake' news example: During the coronavirus lockdown, a Danish photo agency, Ritzau Scanpix, commisioned two photographers to use two different perspectives to shoot scenes of people in socially-distance scenarios. Were people observing the rules? Or did the type of lens (wide-angle and telephoto) intentionally give a misleadling impression? The pictures are here - the article is in Danish, but the photos tell the story: https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-04-26-hvor-taet-er-folk-... |
|