|
|
|
|
|
by dylan604
1752 days ago
|
|
Ignore no, but if going after one case costs so much that other cases cannot be persued, then some sort of balancing act needs to be decided. If they feel that the extra money being spent is essentially marketing money to get their name out there that these cases are persued, then they may feel it is justified expenses. After all, we're talking about it. Then again, mabye the first case costs $200k, but the second case will only cost a fraction since the exeprience is there.?? |
|