Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by areoform 1748 days ago
A few weeks ago a Russian-speaking friend in the aerospace industry (hey Dennis!) surprised me with photos of Yuri Gagarin (and other cosmonauts from Air Force Group 1) engaging with a re-usable lifting body aircraft, https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/836685279875956746/87...

The vehicle was the subject of his thesis with the following diagrams apparently being sourced from it, https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/836685279875956746/87... The design is a fairly striking, lifting body design being pursued in the early 60s! (Russian source, http://www.buran.ru/other/Buran_Gagarin.pdf )

This meant that the first human in orbit and on another heavenly body both worked on reusable space vehicles (Gagarin's vehicle and the Dyna-Soar by Neil Armstrong). That's a fairly incredible coincidence that begs the question; why? Why did two different agencies - walled off from each other at opposite ends of the world - converge on the same design?

Apparently, as with many things from that era, the answer is the Nazis. More specifically, the Silbervogel, a lifting-body, sub-orbital, liquid-fuel-rocket-powered vehicle designed in the 1930s by Irene Bredt and Eugene Sanger. This is the very first known design of its kind, and it seems to have shaped much of aerospace history. For e.g. regeneratively cooled nozzles trace their history back to this design, as the Silbervogel was designed to operate with one due to their early experiments/tests. They also did substantial work in the physical and physio-chemical properties of liquid-fueled rockets that stands as some of the earliest work on the subject.

Eugene Sanger has become well known in rocketry circles and has been credited for some of the analytical techniques used to estimate the performance of liquid-fueled rockets due to his book, Raketenjlugtechnik (Rocket Flight Technology) that he published in 1933 (along with additional literature later on). Because of this public material, the field remembers him as one of the origin points for these analytical techniques. But it turns out that might be wrong.

Thanks to the records about the silbervogel and subsequent reports - http://www.astronautix.com/data/saenger.pdf , I've found that Sanger was the engineer who designed the lifting body, but Irene was the mathematician and physicist who modeled their experiments and derived the calculations we use today. This fact is fairly exciting to a nerd like me. It's my first contribution to academia/the official record! :)

However, it's not that far off to say that Bredt & Sanger are both the progenitors of multiple sub-fields of modern aerospace research, especially re-usable spaceplanes.

2 comments

Re-usable spaceplanes were a technological dead end. They're much more expensive than even single-use rockets, let alone reusable rockets.

More on the Buran: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)

From a certain perspective, the Starship is a more evolved version of certain STS-Apollo variants - https://www.wired.com/2012/04/the-lut-the-shuttle-and-the-sa..., one proposed North American X15B design http://www.astronautix.com/x/x-15b.html and a few dynasoar configurations.

Spaceplanes haven't gone away. They've just been evolved. The Shuttle, for all its mistakes, got a lot of things right and brought incredible capabilities to the table that are well worth re-exploring and re-imagining.

I would just take issue with your use of "lifting body". The photo you linked to (and DynaSoar and the U.S. Space Shuttle for that matter) are closer to simple winged spacecraft and not what I would call lifting bodies.
This was one of Yuri's original designs, https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/836685279875956746/87...

As you can see, it is much closer to the lifting body concept than the other craft. I suspect they converged on the Shuttle-like design because of cost and manufacturing constraints. But this unsupported speculation.

Also his designs incorporated grid fins! In the 1960s!