>In the 19th century Roussel started a campaign in France to restrict consumption of maize and eradicated the disease in France
I fail to see how:
1. that's a viable solution in the US, where corn is the dominant grain in many regions
2. it benefits "the elites" to keep growing corn. Surely it's bad for business if your workers' skins were falling off and couldn't work?
>In the 19th century Roussel started a campaign in France to restrict consumption of maize and eradicated the disease in France
I fail to see how:
1. that's a viable solution in the US, where corn is the dominant grain in many regions
2. it benefits "the elites" to keep growing corn. Surely it's bad for business if your workers' skins were falling off and couldn't work?