|
|
|
|
|
by lwansbrough
1750 days ago
|
|
> I would pitch it as a global, provably immutable network where anyone can participate pseudonymously, where state control is difficult and thus censorship is difficult. The network is completely traceable. Anti-censorship is worthless without protection. I do something on the network my government doesn't like, they track me down and put me in jail. Great system. The failings of political systems are not overcome by changing the financial instruments used. |
|
It is traceable when the appropriate dataset is overlaid on top of it. Ie. IP addresses, known public keys associated with people/organizations. Within itself, you don't know who is sending or receiving.
Anti-censorship is worthless without protection.
Protection comes from anonymity/pseudonymity.
I do something on the network my government doesn't like, they track me down and put me in jail. Great system.
Yes, its almost as if you need to take steps and precautions to ensure that your government cannot track you down. You know where its even easier to trace your transactions and freeze your assets? Your bank account.