[AndrewDucker]

From that post, it gets 4x the efficiency but loses 70% in transmission. Which basically cancel each other out.

So the only advantage is the 24x7 availability. Which is a big advantage, but I'm not sure if it's big enough.

[elcritch]

It should be possible with investment in current tech to get transmission losses down to 30-40% or less, IMHO. There’s lot better power transistors, controls, and simulation to improve over the last experiments done decades ago. Some were done in the 1970’s. Incremental improvements do add up.

[ben_w]

You could do antipodal HVDC for ~50% loss with the stuff currently on the market (3.5% loss per 1000km).

I do like one of the other suggestions to use this for Mars solar — Mars has a much bigger problem with dust blocking sunlight than Earth does — but I don’t see it being more than experimental here, at least not without a unified world government to remove political risks and a whole bunch of other tech that might make it redundant anyway.

[elcritch]

Mars would be interesting, along with powering space mining operations. Perhaps focused mirrors on the moon or in earth orbit to illuminate earth based solar panel arrays at night. I'd guess aluminum mirrors in space would stay reflective for many decades.

[ben_w]

> I'd guess aluminum mirrors in space would stay reflective for many decades.

How long stuff lasts is an interesting point I has not considered. More UV, micro-meteors, even the question of what light pressure does to the orbits over a few years, given the large surface area to mass ratio. I don’t know how similar or different conditions are in the ISS orbit versus any other.

That aside, I think optical mirrors are going to be the least acceptable with regard to security/defence types, as that’s the easiest to be surreptitiously modified into a death ray, just because all the elements are physically smaller. With RF you can at least make it so any modifications are ridiculously obvious, even if you still have to care about malicious combination of multiple systems.

But on the Moon? Not only will we probably only need at most a handful, the fact that the Earth-Moon distance is much larger than most orbits considered for space-based solar power means even a maliciously retargeted combination of system would be much less of a threat.

[goohle]

It can be used as light source for cities at night, or even as CO2-free heating system for big cities at winter. Just imagine environmental cost of heating of New-York.