[rurban]

It's a measurable difference. OO in C++ must use double indirect vtable method calls, whilst this OO in C uses only one indirection. It's measurably faster. Objects are a bit larger though, cloning is a bit more expensive, but method calls are much faster and much easier to cache.

[aaaaaaaaaaab]

I think you're misinterpreting GP's code. It is a vtable, hence the static const. There would be a pointer in each struct "instance" to this static vtable, thus the same double indirection would occcur as in C++.

[mst]

Plus this was a discussion about conceptual models and "what counts as OO", not the specific details and optimisation possibilities of the implementation.

[rurban]

OP mimic'd C++ vtables. But in C you can do better and inline them. I mostly inline them for performance reasons.