| > https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/10/hillary-c... >... meaning people who were racist, sexist, homophobic or xenophobic so not "Rural and working class white people", unless you think those attributes are fundamentally a part of being "Rural and working class white". >https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/29/politics/wives-of-the-dep... 0 matches for "rural" 1 match for "working", but in the same context as "working class" 3 matches for "white", but they're all used in discussions about voting patterns, not in describing "deplorables" >https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/clin... 0 matches for "rural" 0 matches for "working" 1 match for "white", but it was "white house". |
No, but the New York Times does, insofar as it’s constantly calling all Trump voters white supremacists. (Clinton was gracious, she called only “half” of Trump supporters “deplorables.”)
More to the point, whatever the personal moral shortcomings of rural white Trump voters, they don’t have any power. The media smoothly segues from talking about systemic racism to talking about the personal prejudices of individual Trump voters. But the people who control the systems are woke. The Black-white wealth gap results from folks on Wall Street who read Robin Di Angelo, not folks in Lincoln City, OR who don’t want her ideas taught in their elementary schools.
Wokeness is a white hedge fund manager putting his arm around a white Wal-Mart greeter and admitting that white people are the reason for persistent racial wealth gaps (but at least he’s “doing the work”).