Seems like a reasonable response. Apple has now revealed that they were capable of failing to consider the optics on this one which is worrying regardless of what happens next. It's really unbelievable that we now live in a world like this. Yet another reason that I feel like I stumbled into a dystopian novel these past six years or so. Never imagined I would live to see something like it.
Me too. I am moving into the forest to be with animals and insects, because no matter where I go, humans do naughty things and I will not stand for it.
There are still solutions, even though the situation is dire. The problem is, those solutions should not eat up too much of one's time, and the naughters not past the naught of one's energies, preferably.
Of course one may finance malicious endeavours hence encourage them - but since this is against the most basic rule of "do not encourage undesirable behaviour", that one may be shortsighted, while in fact antisocial.
Is it possible that the poster defends antisocial behaviour coating the opposite as antisocial?