[cratermoon]

I shortened the title to fit HN limits. Why do you think "34 out of 36 were wrong" is less scary than "94% were wrong"?

[rhacker]

Another way to think about that: %99.99 of AIs lose chess against our best human player.

When in reality 1 AI consistently beats all Human players every time.

[cratermoon]

Only if you can go back and demonstrate that the 2 AIs that didn't fail are consistent and demonstrably correct. Otherwise they just got lucky.