[unknownOrigin]

You literally can't use the site properly when you're not logged in (and I mean basic clicking on retweeted/quoted stuff shows a login page, clicking on people's names shows a login page etc.) - how is that good? (I mean sure, build your walled garden as you please, but then you have no business showing in search engine results.)

[setgree]

I've been encountering this a lot today, because apparently the MTA (and the Metro North) have decided that Twitter is their official news distribution channel [0]. They're posting updates there more frequently than they are on their official website, and because we're in the middle of dealing with a hurricane, they're pushing me to interact with Twitter to figure out how to get home tonight.

Apropos of that: the MTA is using threads now, and I can't click 'show thread' without being redirected to a login screen. I don't want to create an account because I find twitter painfully shallow but also addictive, as well as generally untrustworthy (I don't want them to have my phone number).

I don't think that any part of the government should be using twitter the way the MTA is; but so long as they are, I think Twitter would do well to get out of the way of the distribution of vital info.

[0] https://twitter.com/MetroNorth

[clairity]

governments should be strictly prohibited from requiring privacy-invasive (tracking, deanonymizing) technology for any service, let alone emergency services. a gov website requiring google fonts, apis, captcha and tracking is not in accordance with the basic civil right of being free of government surveillance (via said 3rd-parties).

[handrous]

Twitter should be a protocol integrated into browsers, not a site.

[ambicapter]

Wasn't that RSS?

[handrous]

It's close, but browser support & integration was never good enough, and that lacks the ability to carry on a dialog or to attach one's own post to someone else's, which people clearly want.

Any move to develop it further to add those sorts of things would have run into the same problem other protocols have for the last 20+ years, which has made them even more difficult to develop and promote than they already were: keeping huge numbers of users captive has become per se valuable, thanks to having as-complete-as-possible spying-generated profiles on people and massive datasets being important both to the money-spigot of the modern online ad market, and for developing machine-learning solutions to dominate other "verticals" (against any competitor who lacks the same massive, spying-obtained datasets, so is at a huge disadvantage). Application-level open protocols make tracking & spying harder, so companies chasing those datasets really don't want them around. The few that survive in common use do so under constant threat, protected only by luck, by already being "good enough", and by having already established a large presence before that sort of business model really took off.

[EDIT] incidentally, pioneering the inclusion of an open, cross-site social network as a first-class browser feature is one of my crazy ideas for how Firefox could save itself from irrelevance—but like most of the other ideas I have to save them, it's probably too late anyway.

[babelfish]

Certainly a dark pattern, but has little to do with the actual usability of the product once you’re logged in.