|
|
|
|
|
|
by jt2190
1755 days ago
|
|
|
> If someone wrote such a proposal… So, in this scenario: * hiring manager tells the candidate they’ll get a “quick promotion”, but only if they “don’t suck”. * candidate responds with proposed clarifications of “speedy” and “suck”. * hiring manager drops candidate from consideration. Did I get this right? > And I'm highly skeptical a company will agree to a milestones-rewards plan for an individual employee. And yet hiring managers play fast and loose with employee expectations all the time, even if their company would never honor such promises as a matter of policy. How would you propose a candidate determine whether the hiring manager is making promises in good faith? |
|
|
One of the worst offenses is the one we're discussing in this thread: a HM or recruiter says "We're slotting you at level 4 instead of level 5, because we like to give employees room to grow." That's a BS line -- put me in at 5 and grow me to 6, then! If you hear this line, you just need to understand it's poppycock and make a decision from there.
But basically everything a hiring manager says about a position can turn out to be just wishful thinking on their part:
* The team is most likely not solving a big problem
* The company most likely does not work well together
* The position problem does not have huge room to grow