|
|
|
|
|
by eru
1758 days ago
|
|
> Let me stop you right there. Generally speaking, you shouldn't hold cash. Nobody should hold cash. Nobody should have ever held cash because even at the baseline expectation 2% inflation that's still a loss. Nah, holding cash is fine under some circumstances. Yes, the 2% inflation that the Fed chose to aim for makes holding cash costly. But everybody holds cash. It's just that higher inflation expectations makes people hold less cash in real terms. But then, you can be angry at the Fed for choosing that particular inflation target. The Fed could just as well go for 0% inflation. Or even go for a stable nominal GDP 65,000 USD per year per capita in perpetuity. (The latter would basically automatically ensure its dual mandate. Though most of the proponents of nominal GDP level targeting suggest to target a slight increase over time.) In such a stable nominal-GDP system, holding cash would be rational in many more circumstances than today, because in general cash would slowly increase in real value as productivity and thus real GDP improved. |
|