[approxim8ion]

The approach seems two-pronged:

1. Those who are aware of VPNs but have the money and would like to support Firefox can do so by using their product.

2. Those who aren't very aware of the vpn scene can trust a relatively more prevalent name in Firefox while still getting a reliable service and giving them money.

It's not ideal from a value perspective but I don't feel like it is egregious.

[duxup]

>Those who are aware of VPNs but have the money and would like to support Firefox can do so by using their product.

That's me.

[vayeate]

Same.