I wouldn't give too much importance to Stuart Ritchie. He is right-wing and conservative, and conservatives hate Sapolsky.
Ritchie's political views are evident in his book.
I read Science Fictions and don't recall politics coming up much. Ironically, his most political point was his defense of the Mertonian norm of universalism from both leftist and rightist critiques. That norm is relevant in this discussion :P. That said, I haven't read his other book.
Politics aside, those theories did fail replication. Forget I mentioned Ritchie at all and the problem remains.
The replication crisis would be with us even if every right-wing pundit suddenly disappeared. Much like heliocentrism exists independent of Copernicus or the Church.
Replication crisis isn't political at its core, it is scientific.
Yes, but it should be contextualized. The replication crisis is present in many fields other than psychology. For example in ML and Computer Science, where most "findings" aren't verified empirically at all.
Politics aside, those theories did fail replication. Forget I mentioned Ritchie at all and the problem remains.