|
|
|
|
|
by shakna
1749 days ago
|
|
Even basic upscaling algorithms can guess a surprising amount of detail. When I was putting together a simple and fast method, a while back, I compared my own to the very, very, basic and ended up with this [0]. The far left is the original, the others are just shifting the scale percentage. There's a surprising amount of detail kept, even though all of the algorithms were pushed way beyond what should be considered their limits. (Purposefully - to expose bias that was easier to analyse.) [0] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shakna-israel/upscaler_ana... |
|
Irish Setter example seems to introduce detail that is not part of the original small image, like the lighter/whitish area between the dog's eyes.