[janto]

That there is any life left at all is because it has kept on reproducing. The only other viable strategy to persist is to be a rock.

Re-growth (from what starting point?) is insufficient. You either expand in number or you run the risk of ceasing to exist when your numbers are threatened.

I'd choose going for growth ad infinitum and the associated risks. Trying anything else will get me killed.

[posterboy]

> That there is any life left at all is because it has kept on reproducing

utter nonsense, observer survivor bias

> The only other viable strategy to persist is to be a rock.

pseudo intellectual bulls

> Re-growth (from what starting point?) is insufficient

That there is any life left at all is because it has kept (from what starting point?) on reproducing. That one?

You are not making any sense

[janto]

Are you suggesting that not replicating has been a better survival strategy for organisms?