|
|
|
|
|
by yarcob
1755 days ago
|
|
That 50 people team probably costs at least 250000/month. Are you going to take away a tool that everyone on the team needs to save 1250? Or put another way, how much time would you need to replicate what Docker offers for a team of 50 people? If it takes more than 25% of the time of a single employee, then Docker is cheaper (assuming your employee costs $5000 a month, which I guess is a lower bound for an engineer). |
|
I think it is a very valid question how to monetize Docker (and all the other libraries we are using for free), but I am personally not sure that subscriptions to everything are the solution.
I am sure that this expense should not get into your way if you have 50+ engineers, however if you think that with all expenses…