|
|
|
|
|
by cjlars
1755 days ago
|
|
I'm in SF. The tricky thing here is that outdoor humidity is often so high that a humidistat would only result in an 'always on' system. I think CO2 is an objectively better measure anyway. You can remove humidity and particulate with energy efficient machines. You can't (realistically) do that with CO2 / VOCs. |
|