[tpxl]

> Tbh, I don’t know why subscriptions get such a bad rap on HN

Because a lot of the times things don't need a subscription, but it's just a way for the company to squeeze more money out of you.

Some things you can't buy of course, like a streaming service, and I do pay for them. However, I will never 'rent' an online movie which I can only watch once or some such bullshit where the limitation is 0% technical and 100% someone wanting more money out of me.

[not_exactly__]

> I will never rent an online movie

Why not? I do it all the time for a simple economic reason: renting is $2.99 and buying is $14.99.

If I haven’t seen the movie yet and I don’t feel super strongly about it, I don’t feel like paying the full price. Of course if I end up loving the movie and want to buy it, I’ll end up having spent an extra $2.99 to rent something I now plan to own. But I can’t remember ever doing that. I rent. I watch. I move on.

Also I wouldn’t buy a movie that I can’t store in a physical format.

[tpxl]

> Why not?

1. "Buying" is usually 15$ in my experience, not 3$.

2. Like said, the limitation is not technical, it's purely milking users.

3. I like to own stuff and sometimes play older games and watch older movies. Renting is just a non-starter for that, unless you want to overpay out the nose.

[2Gkashmiri]

hehe. In india, a couple months ago they did an experiment of launching a big ticket movie online for the first time. Here is how they put it, after you pay . open this page https://www.zee5.com/zee-plex-movies-on-rent and click on how it works. then "How to buy and watch ZEEPLEX movies?".

they say "buy and watch" but then say "pay per view service", then there are stupid watch time requirements and all that.

piracy is 1 click, just press play. then these idiots go and equate piracy as a heinous crime