|
|
|
|
|
by webinvest
1751 days ago
|
|
I’d bet money that Apple’s or Cook’s could afford an accountant that is smart enough to structure the deal so that it would be all long term capital gains instead of all ordinary income. Just say that he received the shares a year ago or when he started but those shares weren’t vested until now. Then it would be 23.8% federal instead of 37% federal… Although our government is broke and needs that extra tax revenue. |
|
The particular shares involved _could_ have used a different legal structure, but that's not my understanding based on the articles I've seen about this.
But even in your hypothetical it would not all be capital gains. It would be ordinary income for the value of the shares at the point of the grant, and capital gains for the appreciation since then.