Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pegas1 1754 days ago
not really. So far, the issue is exaggerated. He obviously obraied made up or modified data from some insurance, used them without deep suspicion. Once it was obviousl that there experiments could not be replicated, he did publish the original data. And as soon as he saw indications of inappropriatenes, he withdraw the original paper.

So, so far, one lousy, or lazy and rushed up paper publication.