Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by icedchai 1760 days ago
I knew several colleges that had the entire campus on a flat /16 network. Dozens of buildings, 1000's of computers. It worked fine. Well, except for the "no firewall" part (this was mid 90's.)
2 comments

That was fine as long as the network was thinnet or thicknet as most universities probably were, because a well planned network would start at the hub and extend out and terminate. When networks became more based on 10baseT and you could add devices by just plugging a very cheap hub into a wall socket, and then plug another hub into that, for cheap, you could get loops more easily, and degraded broadcast quality, and that kills the entire network.
Thinnet / thicknet were a maintenance nightmare though, compared to 10baseT. One loose tap or terminator would kill a whole segment.
Yes, it was indeed! But the PITA-ness and need for termination meant that once it was planned and implemented, it was rarely monkeyed with for a while.
MIT originally was single /8 network (Class A from before CIDR), however they had it subdivided with routers AFAIK pretty soon.

CISCO had a lot of early customers among universities because dedicated box ran better than random unix workstation pulled out from other duties (or even sharing them) running RIP and the like.