|
|
|
|
|
|
by byroot
1753 days ago
|
|
|
The source is me: https://gist.github.com/casperisfine/1c46f05cccfa945cd156f44... Note that this overhead apply as soon as a refinement is defined for a method regardless of wether it's ever active. That 40% figure is for an empty method. So for "big" methods that are infrequently called it's probably fine, but it should really be avoided in hotspots. |
|
|
For me refinements are a bit like meta-programming; I'm glad they exist but I think there's other ways to get the same result which are easier to live with.