|
|
|
|
|
by skinkestek
1758 days ago
|
|
My point is that you respond to one claim with something else while cutting the context and pretending it is the same. And as I already pointed out the article is pretty clear that there isn't actually convincing evidence, especially not against Israel (it seems to be about a possible rogue NGO or something?) |
|
There seems to be a very obvious bias in your comments. This is a fact accepted by the Israeli government that I have already pointed out to you, but you keep ignoring it.
https://www.pri.org/stories/2013-01-28/israel-admits-injecti...