|
|
|
|
|
by bko
1752 days ago
|
|
Ah yes, competition is what causes higher prices. We just need one organization creating the products and services for a given industry and setting prices. I wonder why no one else thought of this and why we don't apply it to everything we produce |
|
Since no one said that, I don't know what you are talking about. This has nothing to do with competition being bad or good. The US isn’t the only country with private insurance. The US model competes in a fee-for-service model, instead of based on things like positive health outcomes through global budgeting, like Germany or Canada. The US model has providers negotiate prices which each individual insurer, with the actual costs being hidden and complex, instead of a transparent “all-payer reimbursement rate” for each provider[1]. Maryland, the only state to use global budgeting and all-payer reimbursement, is saving over $100,000,000 per year on healthcare spending compared to the national average[2].
I really do not understand how people can act like quality healthcare at lower prices is some utopian dream, and not the reality in every single high-income country except the US. That people can look at the US spending 3 times more money on paper pushing as the next highest country, while not even cracking the top 10 in spending on preventive or long-term healthcare, and throw their hands up and say “its unsolvable!” [3] How people can look at the American’s barely middle of the road health outcomes and think the out of control spending is somehow actually leading to quality care. The condescending dismissive attitude in the face of mountains of data from working healthcare systems around the world is truly stunning.
[1] https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/reports/2...
[2]https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170131.05855...
[3] https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2020/07/how-does-the-us-healthcare...