[over_bridge]

I'm of the opinion that competition is unnecessary too. It seems more of a modern construct than a natural law - one aimed at disenfranchising workers and creating divisions between people who should be allies. If two lions constantly fight with other, do they get stronger, or do they become weak, injured and maimed? Much better to work together. I can't imagine that humans in hunter gatherer tribes competed with each other, nor in villages. What a waste of energy. Between two different ones, sure, but the default human interaction would have been a cooperative one with your peers looking out for you.

[akiselev]

Economic competition isn't a battle between two animals or a war or something. It's a decentralized optimization or maximization strategy. Sometimes it works well, sometimes it doesn't, but it's not some violent struggle between competitors (usually).

[fleddr]

Fully agree, hunter gatherers were cooperative, which means we are cooperative from birth.

The competition institutes we have today are very recent and made up.

A business or organization does not naturally occur, and hasn't for 99.99% of our existence. Same for countries.