[srcreigh]

I read it two years ago. I personally believe it's amazing as an example of what 150% of a good thing looks like, and the point is deciding what 1/3rd to cut to make a neat 10/10.

Without that book, you barely see what 50% of programming goodness looks like. The only way to 100% is to go too far and dial it back. Offering 150%, imo, is a humble way to offer a path forward without getting the reader all the way there. Maybe it's better that way.