|
|
|
|
|
by BugsJustFindMe
1759 days ago
|
|
> Much better to just use a randomly generated ID and then provide a separate timestamp, so that you can provide one without revealing the other. If you're talking about allocating the same number of bits either way, your way vs their way just expresses a trade between never rolling the random number generator twice for the same entry because you can't generate collisions at different times (theirs) and demanding a uniqueness guarantee for just the random portion on its own and thus re-rolling on collision (yours). Would subsequently encrypting the time-based IDs before sharing them satisfy your desire to not leak the time information? |
|