Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by GuB-42 1760 days ago
No GPL without software licensing. And no Linux without GPL.

By requiring the source to be available with the software, licenses drove the free software movement.
1 comments
pydry 1760 days ago
GPL also wouldnt be needed without software licensing.

No reason Linux couldnt exist. All software would effectively be FOSS by default.

link
GuB-42 1760 days ago
Free but not open source.

GPL is here to make sure the source code doesn't stay secret, and it is an essential part of the Linux development process, the driver model in particular. In fact, I don't see how a community driven, widely supported, monolithic kernel could be made without a copyleft license.

Linux without GPL wouldn't be Linux, and out of the free OSes (BSD, GNU/HURD, Haiku, Minix, ...), Linux is the most successful.

link
pydry 1759 days ago
If every employee of your company were able to take and release your source code anyway the GPL couldnt really make things more open.
link