|
|
|
|
|
by parineum
1759 days ago
|
|
> Plus, the proposal of registration fees based on mass+volume seems to be better in all aspects, cause it is both more granular and more fair It's more granular and still unfair. Think about it this way, if all roads disappeared tomorrow, what would be your biggest problem? In my opinion, it'd be food. I own a bicycle and live within cycling distance of a grocery store but where would they get the food? The next thing that gets brought up is something like, "well, if it weren't for all those people driving that aren't shipping goods, road maintenance would be much less." That's true except I also benefit from commuters being able to work. All those commuters are busy driving to their jobs _at_ all the places that supply me with goods. The idea that only the people that drive on the roads themselves are the ones using it is incredibly surface level thinking. In fact, we all know that the vehicles that do the most damage to roads are the large trucks shipping goods and the only reason they exist is to bring me stuff. |
|