|
|
|
|
|
by zem
1764 days ago
|
|
i think two things drove it out: 1. the long-standing confusion between "someone who tinkers with programs" and "someone who maliciously breaks into systems" the tinkering contingent fought diligently against letting the black hat contingent coopt the term, but then 2. the tech-bro/marketer crowd caught hold of it, and it became associated with other cringy terms like "ninja" and "rockstar". (tangentially, "wizard" also got dragged down that way). so now if you call yourself a hacker, people are more likely to think of both black hats and tech bros than of the (still out there!) people who just want to do interesting stuff with computers. |
|
And it should be that way. If you want any chance of knowing how to build good things, you need to know how to break them. That's as true for a bridge engineer as it is for Woz.
Personally, I find the attempt to distinguish between hacker and cracker to be some sort of no-true-scotsman retcon. I've always viewed the whole concept of hacker culture to be amoral...and the attempt to distinguish between "good" or "bad" hackers has just watered down the term.