|
|
|
|
|
by danellis
1763 days ago
|
|
> Usually, if you are thinking about generics you are reaching for abstraction when you don't need to be. That's pretty laughable considering the language designers included type-parameterized collections in the language. Apparently they recognized the need for them; they just didn't think you were smart enough to make your own. After all, Go was explicitly designed for programmers who are, in the words of its creator, "not capable of understanding a brilliant language". |
|