|
|
|
|
|
by oaiey
1764 days ago
|
|
That is a difference in the European understanding of punishment and especially redemption. After your punishment was served, what redemption is possible when your acts cannot be forgotten? The dignity of the human being is untouchable (paragraph 1 of the German constitution). What dignity can you expect when a nude picture of you exist online. Or of a stupid speech you gave. Or of your childhood carneval costume as a Nazi. Or when mug shot of DUI incident is online. Or when your stupid, disgusting, humiliating behavior as a soldier in Iraq is documented everywhere after you served for your war crime.
When you have the concept of redemption in your society, than it needs to be feasible to be redeemed. Yes I understand that there are extreme examples but it falls in the same category if you consider the dignity of the human being as the most precious thing. So a consequence, the right to be forgotten exists. |
|