[mapgrep]

OP was correctly refuting the prior post which claimed "US govt" (that means federal) is "mostly in the business of insurance (welfare, healthcare) and 'education'. Defense and infrastructure come some time after those."

It's just not true that the federal government spends more on education than defense, in fact it's very lopsided in the other direction.

The context is a thread on the federal income tax specifically, and someone said the federal govt used to be not very technologically ambitious, and someone else says, essentially, it still isn't technologically ambitious, it spends most of its money on education and social welfare. OP corrected that. The social welfare part has some validity but federal education spending is quite minor.

Yes the total spending by all govts in the US including state + local has a lot more education spending but the thread and the whole article are focused on federal taxes.

[rsj_hn]

No, "US Government" means government at all levels in most uses.

[mapgrep]

Totally incorrect. The most cursory research (e.g. a Google for “US government”, a search on the nytimes, lookup in the AP style guide) will refute this.

Anyway, regardless of your personal definition of the term, the intent of communication of the person you are replying to is crystal clear and in obvious contradiction to your analysis. (That person expressly uses the word “federal.”)

[stevenicr]

My initial reaction is to disagree with this statement and to point out that I think the parent comment is sorting the issue well.

As I think about more though, I must wonder if this could be a regional thing and varies.. and or if that is relevant to the specifics in this thread.

The more I think about it, I wonder if places like Cali and NY would think of things in that manner.. with places like Texas and TN thinking very differently.

It's an interesting thought, and wonder if there is data / polls out there for something seemingly basic like this.