[orcasushi]

You are right, but very traditional. Try to think in a modern spirit.

If the logo can be created for by a few hundred bugs of ai service there is no need for it to last longer then a few months. Also traditional logos were created for print. If you are a 'onscreen only' company, there is really no need for a simple logo. (dont bother about asset size when the average website includes several mb of spam and js frameworks)

Further I would not know why a ai would eventually not be capable of generating a 'simple' logo with just blezer curves and few colors.

Lastly I think many of these 'simple logos' are boring. I admit I prefer the ai logos from the post. Yes call me a barbarian and yes the human drawn logo's could probably be better if made by a top notch designer (and costs $$$$$).

The future will probably be a hybrid situation where the designer is aided by ai.

[RugnirViking]

"then there is no need for it to last more than a couple months" - this isn't true at all, a long lasting logo is something that is very important to branding. If you keep changing your logo, customers won't form opinions on your brand it will simply be left in the memory hole