|
|
|
|
|
by ehsankia
1764 days ago
|
|
Can't they just make a new one and recompute the 2nd secret hash on the whole data set fairly easily? Also, the whole point is that it's fairly easy to create a fake image that collides with one hash, but doing it for 2 is exponentially harder. It's hard to see how you could have an image that collides with both hashes (of the same image mind you). |
|
Of course, it won't be public (and if it ever became public they'd replace it with a different secret hash).