[thepasswordis]

Which thing do you think will do more to convince your friend that the election was clean?

1) You are not allowed to look at the ballots, and if you do you are traitor. Just trust us and stop asking questions.

2) Look at these things as many times as you want.

[MagicWishMonkey]

I point out that there have been multiple audits, already, and no proof of fraud was found.

Doing a third audit, with zero oversight/accountability, is not a serious attempt to detect fraud. It's a means to "discover" wrongdoing that can't be proven/disproven and further confuse people about what really happened.

[dane-pgp]

Unfortunately option 2 isn't what's being offered here in any legitimate way. Instead there is a stream of bizarre theories which are given as much publicity as possible, before being quietly discarded and replaced with the next one.

The point isn't to reach the truth, but to cement in people's minds the idea that a massive crime has occurred, based on the psychological bias of "there's no smoke without fire", despite all the smoke being generated by a smoke machine.

This strategy of misinformation has long been known, and was portrayed quite brilliantly in the 1962 film "The Manchurian Candidate":

> Are they saying: "Are there any Communists in the Defense Department?" No, of course not, they're saying: "How many Communists are there in the Defense Department?"

https://www.quotes.net/mquote/121163