[achairapart]

Does it have to be a photo of an actual human?

Why not a work of graphic/art? A unicorn perhaps?

[itronitron]

I think that's a better option as the 'thispersondoesnotexist' images can't be guaranteed to not actually look exactly like someone.

[_0ffh]

That could always happen, no matter how you generate the photo, but it's all but impossible that they'd also have the matching name.

[yvoschaap]

Pretty sure the Google algo would feature a isHumanDisplayed() for the photo's that would qualify.

[achairapart]

But is Google looking for a human or it just picks the first homonymous human as a poorly automated fallback because there is no other data available?

As far as I know, this worked at least for people like Banksy, Vincent van Gogh, the Zodiac killer and a few others.

[sumosudo]

From what I can tell, Google engineers would actually write `isObjectDisplayed("Human")`