|
|
|
|
|
|
by kokey
1764 days ago
|
|
|
I somehow like this a lot. This looks kind of what Windows NT would have been if NT 4.0 never happened, or if OS/2 survived, or if MacOS or Windows went to a Unix kernel in the early 90s. It's a bit like the Nissan Figaro of desktop operating systems. That said, going back to an alternative past can be useful beyond an art project, it could evolve into helping along the vision for better lightweight desktop operating systems of the future. For example this might work very well as a remote desktop living on virtual infrastructure, or work well as the base for a remote desktop client. |
|
|
Why? As I recall it, NT4 was the one that caught the NT line up to the W95 look, replacing NT3.5(1)'s look inherited from W3(.1). So, on the contrary: This looks just like NT4 / W2K.