|
|
|
|
|
by kouteiheika
1766 days ago
|
|
There are many differences, but the main ones are that it has less overhead when profiling, more thorough analysis features (Heaptrack's GUI is relatively simple compared to it), and the next version will have scripting capabilities for analysis. |
|
I tried `cargo install --git https://github.com/koute/bytehound.git`, but that results in "error: multiple packages with binaries found: bytehound-cli, bytehound-gather, interrupt, linking, lz4-compress, simulation".
For the time being I'll stick with heaptrack.