[kubb]

Don't get me wrong, gorging yourself on a variety of foods from around the world can be pleasurable. It also gives you zero insight into how people in that country are different than elsewhere.

You could understand more about a country by studying it from home than by visiting it for a week.

I don't like that it's presented as a lifestyle that people should strive to pursue. I know certain people here will vehemently oppose this opinion, because in effect it's a critique of them or that which they admire.

[Retric]

It goes both ways.

No you really can’t understand a culture from a week of study the same way you can from being there for a week. The issue is the millions of unknown unknowns that you never really consider. How large is people’s personal space, where do they stand and look in an elevator, what’s traffic like, how loud are people, etc etc. Of course a week or three isn’t that long, but there are real diminishing returns here.

On the other hand personal experience is very narrow in scope. You’re never going to find out country wide crime rates by wondering around for a week.

[tonyedgecombe]

>Of course a week or three isn’t that long, but there are real diminishing returns here.

I suspect you have to live and work in a place to really understand it. If you are wealthy and visiting a poor country there is virtually zero chance, you will always be too insulated from the reality.

[pessimizer]

If you are wealthy and born and raised in a poor country, you will likely be quite ignorant of most of the lifestyle of most of its people.