|
|
|
|
|
|
by dane-pgp
1772 days ago
|
|
|
> but expensive enough to ruin the profit margins of spammers. And mailing list operators, and charities, and free software projects, and... To be fair, your "rubber stamps" idea does mitigate this problem a lot, but I think the issue still remains that it's hard to get email providers to agree to drop emails from senders that haven't upgraded to this new system, as well as agreeing on a globally consistent set of CAs who are trusted to not act as a cartel. It's even more difficult to get all existing pieces of email sending infrastructure to simultaneously upgrade to support users entering their rubber stamps, not to mention the security concerns of dealing with the funds needed to buy the non-rubber stamps. Perhaps the big email providers could force everyone to implement this as of a certain flag day, but I imagine the response to this weird new tax would be less than enthusiastic. |
|
|
You will whitelist these once you subscribe to them.