|
|
|
|
|
|
by chousuke
1777 days ago
|
|
|
Realistically, a single commit is not going to contain hundreds of thousands of lines of changes unless they're generated code or something. I'm not advocating that you should merge branches by squashing all commits into one lump; that's definitely wrong. I think in terms of patch series, where each patch is a single commit that does something, and each feature is a series of patches consisting of stand-alone refactorings, bug fixes and new APIs required to implement the final feature. But how I actually end up with that clean set of 1-n final commits in a PR or mailing list submission is no-one's business but mine. |
|
|