|
|
|
|
|
by cestith
1773 days ago
|
|
One of the goals with solar thermal is to store the heat in a thermal mass then use that to heat a closed loop steam or gas turbine at night. No fossil fuels are necessary if the system works well enough. There's a recent proof of concept plant using bauxite particles instead of a liquid or gas as the thermal mass. It should help quite a bit in cost and reliability. Rather than a bunch of high-pressure tubing for liquid salts and such, it works with grain lifts. One nice thing about using solar thermal for hydrolysis is that much hotter water is much easier to split with electricity. So if you use some of the heat mass to heat water steam to 600 or 700 C, you can use a lot less of the power post-conversion. A CO2 heat loop might be more efficient than a water steam one, so if the plant isn't dedicated to hydrolysis it might end up with two generation loops. |
|
Net result, PV + batteries simply cost less for more reliable power unless you have backup fossil fuel for heat. If the goal was say 80% reduction of fossil fuels then concentrated solar is ok, it just doesn’t really work for a zero emissions grid because you need just as much storage somewhere else in the system.